E-Submission
Yeungnam University College of MedicineIndexed in: ESCI, Scopus, PubMed,
PubMed Central, CAS, DOAJ, KCI
PubMed Central, CAS, DOAJ, KCI
FREE article processing charge
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original article
- Digital subtraction angiography vs. real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural block
- Kibeom Park, Saeyoung Kim
- Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019;36(2):109-114. Published online January 24, 2019
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2019.00122
- 5,312 View
- 94 Download
- 5 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF - Background
Transforaminal epidural block (TFEB) is an effective treatment option for radicular pain. To reduce complications from intravascular injection during TFEB, use of imaging modalities such as real-time fluoroscopy (RTF) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been recommended. In this study, we investigated whether DSA improved the detection of intravascular injection during TFEB at the whole spine level compared to RTF.
Methods
We prospectively examined 316 patients who underwent TFEB. After confirmation of final needle position using biplanar fluoroscopy, 2 mL of nonionic contrast medium was injected at a rate of 0.5 mL/s under RTF; 30 s later, 2 mL of nonionic contrast medium was injected at a rate of 0.5 mL/s under DSA.
Results
Thirty-six intravascular injections were detected for an overall rate of 11.4% using RTF, with 45 detected for a rate of 14.2% using DSA. The detection rate using DSA was statistically different from that using RTF (p=0.004). DSA detected a significantly higher proportion of intravascular injections at the cervical level than at the thoracic (p=0.009) and lumbar (p=0.011) levels.
Conclusion
During TFEB at the whole spine level, DSA was better than RTF for the detection of intravascular injection. Special attention is advised for cervical TFEB, because of a significantly higher intravascular injection rate at this level than at other levels. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- 1. Lumbosacral radicular pain
Laurens Peene, Steven P. Cohen, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Andre Wolff, Frank Huygen, Antal van de Gaag, Steegers Monique, Kris Vissers, Chris Gilligan, Jan Van Zundert, Koen Van Boxem
Pain Practice.2024; 24(3): 525. CrossRef - Safety of local anesthetics in cervical nerve root injections: a narrative review
Zachary E. Stewart
Skeletal Radiology.2023; 52(10): 1893. CrossRef - An update on technical and safety practice patterns in transforaminal epidural steroid injections
Ashley E. Gureck, Berkenesh Gebrekristos, Razvan Turcu, Dana Kotler, Alec L. Meleger
Interventional Pain Medicine.2023; 2(4): 100286. CrossRef - Thoracic transforaminal epidural steroid injection for management of thoracic spine pain: A multicenter cross-sectional study of short-term outcomes
Josh Levin, John Chan, Lisa Huynh, Matt Smuck, Jayme Koltsov, Bilge Kesikburun, Graham E. Wagner, Marc Caragea, Keith Kuo, Zachary L. McCormick, Byron Schneider, Evan Berlin, D.J. Kennedy, Serdar Kesikburun
Interventional Pain Medicine.2022; 1(1): 100004. CrossRef - The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain
Mansoor M Aman, Ammar Mahmoud, Timothy Deer, Dawood Sayed, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Shane E Brogan, Vinita Singh, Amitabh Gulati, Natalie Strand, Jacqueline Weisbein, Johnathan H Goree, Fangfang Xing, Ali Valimahomed, Daniel J Pak, Antonios El Helou, Priyanka
Journal of Pain Research.2021; Volume 14: 2139. CrossRef
- 1. Lumbosacral radicular pain
First
Prev
